Contact
Contact and corrections
This form is the way in. Corrections are the message we most want to receive: a site that makes confident claims about other companies' technology owes readers a way to say it got something wrong.
What happens next is written down rather than promised loosely. A factual error is corrected on the page and logged publicly with the date, the page, what was wrong, and what it now says. See the corrections policy. A claim we cannot verify either way gets downgraded or removed rather than left standing on our authority.
Before you write
Reporting an error? Include the URL and quote the sentence. A source helps but is not required, since "this contradicts the provider's own page, here is the link" is the most useful message we get.
A page looks stale rather than wrong? That is still worth sending. Every page carries a last-verified date on volatile provider claims, and an old date on a fast-moving topic is a legitimate correction even when nothing is inaccurate yet.
Want to reuse a chart, diagram, or dataset? You already can: attribution and a link back are the only ask. Write only if you want the underlying data in a different shape, or want to check a number before you publish it.
Asking whether we can detect or remove a watermark for you? The short answer is no, and it is not a capacity problem: no public detector exists for any production text watermark, so nobody can verify presence or removal.
What this form stores
Your message, the topic, the page URL if you give one, and a reply address if you choose to leave one. The reply address is used to answer this message and nothing else. Leave it blank and the message is anonymous, though a correction still gets published on its merits.
There is no published email address anywhere on this site, which is deliberate: an address that is not monitored is worse than no address at all. Full detail on the privacy page.